Bible Software: Accordance vs. Logos

This week at the seminary I attend we had a rep from Logos come and demo their Bible software. John, the presenter, did a good job, and I like technological tools so I enjoyed his presentation very much.

That said, here is my initial impression of their software. [context: I’ve been using Accordance Bible software for a number of year to do original language exegesis and general Bible study. Hence, my response will be largely in comparison with Accordance.]

Here are pros and cons that struck me:

Pros

+Includes syntactically tagged databases (Andersen-Forbes for OT; OpenText for NT (though I think only the pastoral epistles are done now; another 6-8 months until entire NT completed)).

This is probably the strongest point for Logos  (indeed it was what excited our Hebrew prof). From what I undrstand, a syntactically tagged database allows us to look not only at morphology (verb, noun, adjective, etc.), but syntax (subject, direct object, etc.). Hence you can search for all the times the “love” is used with God as the subject.

[Accordance response to Andersen-Forbes and OpenText inclusion.  Thankfully, Logos does not have exclusive rights to Andersen-Forbes; hopefully Accordance will be able to incorporate it soon.]

+Vast library (e.g. – Hebrew vocab from our grammar by Page Kelley is even there). Also they said they are continuing to expand their library with an eye toward lay people and scholars. [list of works to be included]

+Footnotes automatically added for copy/pasting references such that if you copy a sentence from a systematic theology (for example), it is automatically footnoted in whatever style you prefer (e.g. – Turabian, SBL, Chicago, etc.)

[This is in the pipeline for Accordance; Scriptural citation options are available in 7.1]

+Parse webpage for Scripture references. For example, he copy/pasted the URL of sermon manuscript by John Piper. It pulled and looked up all the Scripture references.

+Relationships resource which graphically shows the relationships (as described in Scripture; e.g. – Did you know that Sarah was the half-sister of Abraham?)

+Includes and defines BHS apparatus.

+All fonts are in unicode.

Cons

-Still slow. The presenter mentioned that one of the weakness of Logos was its slowness, but that now has been fixed. I’d have to respectfully disagree. Searching even the text for all occurences of a certain word took some time, and even more time was spent searching through the references. I understand that the computer is crunching through a lot of data, but Accordance does similar searches (at least in terms of searching a text) instantly.

-Cluttered interface (GUI).   It just appears clunky and complex.  Not what I’m used to with Accordance.

Sum: Logos has good content, but seems difficult to use.

Here are some more links from the Accordance forums:

North Country

Recently (as in the last 18 months), we’ve seen some excellent movies with a conscience which are based on a true story. These have included Whale Rider, Hotel Rwanda, and, last night, North Country.

North Country is about a female miner in northern Minnesota who filed the first sexual harassment lawsuit back in 1984 (which didn’t get settled until 1998!).

Three thoughts in response to the film (warning: movie spoilers ahead!)

  1. An excellent apologetic against abortion takes place near the end of the film when it is revealed that her son is the result of rape. Josey, the main character and mother in this scene, speaks honestly to her son about the painful reminder of rape he was as he was growing in her womb and her tummy got bigger and bigger. But yet, she knew that he (that is, her son) should not be associated or blamed for the evil of rape, but rather he was beautiful. As you watch the scene, you see her son–a human being–who would have been killed through an abortion. That is, it clearly shows us what (a person) is being destroyed through abortion. [related: Trotting out the toddler]
  2. Ironically, in the film extras there is an interview with a rep from NOW (National Organization of Women) which is a strong supporter of women’s “reproductive rights” [read: abortion]. (By this, I believe, they would only support the rights of a woman outside of the womb and not of a young woman inside the womb [read: female baby].)
  3. There is a flashback to the rape scene. As we watch it as a society, we are properly infuriated, angry, and cry for justice as we see the helpless and innocent victim violated in a most personal way. But do we display the same hatred against other sexual perversions which also degrade women such as pornography, sexual innuendos, and even the “standards” of girl’s and women’s clothing which nearly force them to dress in a compromising manner? No, rather we laud these and other degradations of women. Hmm, who else has a forked tongue?

Humans–both men and women–are created in the image of God. I am thankful for a movie like North Country which calls us to treat all–men and women / old and young–as such.